RSS
 

Archive for March, 2010

Canadian Research Analyst Forecasts Severe Uranium Supply Crunch For Next

30 Mar

Canadian Research Analyst Forecasts Severe Uranium Supply Crunch For Next 10 Years

Uranium to Head North of 500/pound?

Rising Uranium Price May Consolidate Exploration Sector, Driving Intense Takeover Activity

Legendary stock picker James Dines recently compared uranium stocks to the high-flying net stocks of the halcyon days of the Internet expansion era. While the much-hyped and fleeting Y2K crisis never materialized, the U.S. energy crisis for highly sought uranium has been developing for more than twenty years. Still early in the current bullish uranium cycle, investors are scoring triple-digit returns on what some are calling a renaissance in nuclear energy.

Nearly 2 billion people across the planet have no electricity. The World Nuclear Association (WNA) believes nuclear energy could reduce the fossil fuel burden of generating the new demand for electricity. The WNA forecasts a 40-percent jump in worldwide electricity demand over the next five years. The worlds most populated countries, China and India, are in the process of creating the largest energy-consuming class in the history of earth. Both plan aggressive nuclear energy expansion programs. Dozens of lesser developed countries, from Turkey and Indonesia to Vietnam and Venezuela, have announced their eagerness to pursue a civilian nuclear policy to benefit power needs for their burgeoning middle classes.

In a nutshell, global utilities are going to need uranium to help feed the increasing number of nuclear power plants proposed over the next twenty years. Uranium is now in shorter available supply for civilian energy use than ever before. Over the next decade, as demand continues to outstrip supply, analysts are predicting utilities will snap up known uranium inventories sending spot uranium prices to record highs. During this launch phase, investors have taken notice, chasing up the stock prices of many uranium producers and exploration companies.

Uranium Prices May Reach Unbelievable Highs

Toronto-based Sprott Asset Management research analyst, Kevin Bambrough, told STOCKINTERVIEW.COM, There is a good possibility of a supply crunch that could drive uranium prices to unbelievable highs. Various analysts predict price targets for spot uranium, in the near-term, above 40. Canadian Augen Capital Corps managing director David Mason speculated, 100 (US) a pound is within reason within the next year or two. Sydney-based Resource Capital Research is half as generous, forecasting 50/pound by 2007, explaining another 40 percent jump in spot uranium prices will be driven by end users in the power generation market which is urgently trying to secure supply into the future.

How high could spot uranium prices run? Kevin Bambrough made a hypothetical case for uranium trading north of 500. Its a ridiculous price, Bambrough confided. Its hard to speculate if this is even going to happen. While he admits that price would not be sustainable, Bambrough makes an interesting point about the concerns facing utility companies, charged with providing us with our electricity. In his futuristic scenario, Bambrough speculated, Theres a chance that some facilities will have to choose shutting down their nuclear plants (if they can not obtain uranium to fuel the facility). On that basis, Bambrough calculated the operating costs of a nuclear facility versus the operating cost of a competing fuel. In his conjectural model, Bambrough used natural gas priced at 5.

Bambrough explained, Assuming that the coal-fired plants operating capacity, before you would basically shut down a nuclear facility, you would be comparing it to what you would have to bring on, which would be natural gas. If there is a shortage there (with natural gas), what price would it take before I am willing to shut down my nuclear facility? If you were to shut off the nuclear capacity, and fire up more gas to replace it, it would send gas prices through the stratosphere. And that doesnt factor in the cost of shutting down a nuclear facility, itself an exorbitant process. The analyst said he reached his calculation of north of 500/pound for spot uranium, under an extraordinary emergency supply crunch, by answering this question: How much would people pay before they shut it (a nuclear plant) down if there is a shortage of uranium?

Historical cycles support spot prices higher than 40/pound, a level above where uranium may hover for several years. The current cycle of rising uranium prices closely parallels the leap which occurred between February 1975 and April 1976. Spot uranium prices soared from 16 to 40/pound during that 15-month period. During the 1970s cycle, uranium steadily rose from 6.75/pound in November 1973, peaking in July 1978 at 43.40/pound. Since late last year, spot uranium prices soared with the same momentum seen thirty years ago. If history repeats itself, spot uranium prices should trade above 40/pound this year, and stay above that level until the end of this decade or perhaps for a longer stretch.

The key yardstick in determining how much higher uranium prices will climb is by keeping track of the number of new nuclear facilities being constructed or proposed. A few years ago, when we first started investing in uranium, Bambrough explained. There were very few plants being proposed. The numbers have doubled for proposed facilities. And for every one you hear about, theres a lot more being planned. That puts uranium miners into an enviable position. Bambrough added that utilities have to secure their fuel supply for up to six years out, once they decide to build a nuclear facility. The fact is the supply is just not there, warned Bambrough.

In short, U.S. utilities may soon be scrambling for uranium inventory to fuel their nuclear reactors, or face the ridiculous price(s) research analyst Kevin Bambrough warned about. An excerpt from The International Atomic Energy Agencys booklet, Analysis of Uranium Supply to 2050, bears out Bambroughs thesis, As we look to the future, presently known resources fall short of demand. The deficit between newly mined uranium and reactor demand has averaged about 40 million pounds annually over the past decade, cannibalizing existing inventories. As we begin 2006, the supply/demand imbalance has reached a critical phase.

Where Will the Uranium Come From?

In his September 2004 presentation to the World Nuclear Association, Thomas L. Neff of MITs Center for International Studies, stated, The net result of nearly twenty years of inventory liquidation is that existing higher-cost suppliers were driven out of business, new mines were discovered from starting, and exploration was neglected. Neff warned in his conclusion, The problem is the one to two decades that will be needed to expand (production) capacity and build the flow of nuclear fuel that meet the expanding requirements horizon.

The 1970s price spike in uranium was limited because existing uranium mines were quickly ramped up to supply utilities with fuel. Neff noted, This is not the case today and a longer period of high prices could prevail. In Neffs analysis, uranium prices would have risen well above 100/pound in the mid 1970s, using constant 2004 US. On that basis, Bambroughs hypothetical forecast above 500/pound may be not too far out of reach. Neff summarized why the problem has reached a critical stage, We are currently facing the consequences of what may be the largest sustained divergence between expectations and reality in the 60 year history of uranium.

For people who want to bring on new (nuclear) facilities and contract for it, its very difficult to do that, said Bambrough. You have to go to mines that are not even there yet in order to try and contract supply. In this light, it appears the greatest opportunity will appear with the junior uranium companies, which obtained known uranium resources during the last down cycle, and whose operators abandoned such properties because of low prices.

How Can Investors Profit?

Bambrough recalled compiling a worldwide list, in 2003, of a mere 25 companies involving in uranium mining and exploration. I cut the list down to around ten that looked to be promising, said Bambrough. Id say that today there are still less than 30 uranium companies that present a good reward-to-risk ratio considering the massive move the sector has made. Depending upon whose list you believe, the number of companies now mining or exploring for uranium stretches to about 200. The majority trade on either the Canadian or Australian stock exchanges.

What sort of companies has Sprott Asset Management invested in? Bambrough responded, We have preferred to invest in companies that have acquired properties that were once owned and were actively being worked by majors at the end of the 70s bull market. He added, The cost of uranium exploration is so large there is great value built into many of these properties. Specifically, millions of dollars worth of drilling work and data have been collected on some properties. In some cases, mining shafts have been built that only require rehabilitation at a fraction of the cost of starting fresh with a green fields project.

Bambrough shared a few of his favorite uranium stocks. Of the companies that we own, we own a larger percentage of Strathmore Minerals (TSX: STM; Other OTC: STHJF) than almost any other company, said Bambrough. We think theyve got some great properties. They were guys who got into the game very early, and who have skills as they do with David Miller (president and chief operating officer of Strathmore Minerals) in understanding the uranium business. And they have a very large amount of databases, as does Energy Metals Corporation, which is extremely valuable in understanding the properties. Both Strathmore Minerals and Energy Metals have properties in New Mexico and Wyoming. I think the future for New Mexico is quite good, Bambrough noted, as well as ISLs in Texas and Wyoming. Another Sprott Asset Management favorite is Tournigan Gold Corp (TSX: TVC). You look at a past producing region, Bambrough pointed out. They went and got old mines. Tournigan recently drilled the historic Jahodna uranium resource in Slovakia, once drilled by the Russians.

Where the Action Is

The more adventurous price action may be found in the ongoing consolidation within the uranium sector. Bambrough observed, There appear to be a few aggressive junior uranium companies that seem to be moving forward and working to build a major company. In November, one uranium exploration company, Energy Metals Corporation (TSX: EMC) began takeover procedures to acquire two other uranium juniors, Quincy (TSX: QUI) and Standard Uranium (TSX: URN). Standard Uranium has since traded nearly 70 percent higher. There are people who have neighboring properties, and it makes sense for them to come together, advised Bambrough.

In late December, another of Bambroughs favorite uranium companies, Strathmore Minerals (TSX: STM; Other OTC: STHJF), announced it had engaged National Bank Financial as its exclusive financial adviser to review transaction alternatives to maximize shareholder value from its uranium assets. Questioned about this news release, CEO Dev Randhawa told StockInterview.com, National Bank has the best technical team and will help us reach the right decision to maximize the benefit to our shareholders. In a 2005 research report, the Cohen Independent Research Group set a price target of C4.29/share for Strathmore Minerals, based upon the current spot uranium price.

I think the market could really use more large cap uranium companies, since large fund managers currently can really only look to Cameco (NYSE: CCJ) and Energy Resources of Australia (ASX: ERA) to get exposure to the uranium market, said Bambrough. There are several junior companies that should come together to form large uranium companies to leverage their extremely valuable skilled personnel, lower the exorbitant costs of permitting and exploration, and achieving other economies of scale. How soon would it be before a larger company, combining some of these promising juniors, reaches listed status on the New York exchange? I would guess that a NYSE listing may not come until 2007 or 2008, responded Bambrough.

Bambrough remains enthusiastic about the uranium sector and closed his remarks, saying, I expect that we will see a great out performance by quality uranium companies as they move their projects forward. We still see some incredible values and are still actively investing in the space. We are still in the early days of the uranium bull market.

 

Bridging the Gap

23 Mar

We are able to base LTV on the true value of a property, as opposed to purchase price; frequently our savvy investors are able to buy under value and thus

this makes a significant difference.

We are able to base LTV on the projected value of a property when rehab or construction is involved.
We will allow a seller carry back in second position when a buyer is able to negotiate this type of arrangement to his/her advantage. (We loan up to 75% LTV,

but allow CLTV to exceed 125% under certain circumstances.) We will allow a borrower to pledge other real estate assets as additional collateral to make up

for a shortfall in down payment money or earned equity. Besides these options, there is one additional and very effective tool for bridging the gap when the

LTV ratio is running too high: My father has often said that the difference between being able to do a loan and not being able to do a loan is generally our

fee. And there was a time when that was too often the case.

Well, we at California Private Money Loan have made a conscious policy decision to not let that happen ever again. Based on the premise that a dollar

tomorrow is better than no dollars today, we have decided to carry some or all of our fee (as a small second) any time that this is necessary to make an

otherwise good loan fit our LTV criteria.

This is no small thing, as our fee generally runs 4% of the gross loan amount, and our originating brokers (when involved in a transaction) charge anywhere

from 1-5% for their part in the loan process; so with combined fees ranging from 5-10% (I never claimed that private money was cheap; I said that it is fast

and flexible), and assuming broker cooperation, we are able to stretch 75% LTV to as high as 85% LTV. That is a big stretch and frequently it has made the

difference between doing a loan and frankly the opposite of that.

 

Bailiffs & Council Tax – Know Your Legal Rights

16 Mar

Many of us do not know how bailiffs work to collect arrears. Basically, bailiffs are private personnel hired by the local council to handle Council Tax and Poll Tax. Anything that they get from you is auctioned as a way of paying your existing debt. This process of taking your goods, selling them, and paying your debt is called “distraining” or “levying”.

Since October of 1998, the County Court ruled that bailiffs must carry a certificate with them as a proof that they have been hired by the local council. Any complain about a bailiff not following this order can be brought to the attention of the court immediately.

Since April of the same year, a process involving bailiffs and debts has also been at work. This process states that you, as a debtor, must get a letter from the Council which contains the details of your credits. The same notice would bear the warning that if ever you fail to pay your financial obligation within 14 days, bailiffs will be sent to your aid. You may contact a member of the local council within the period for your concerns. You can also make suggestions to the council about the most convenient payment scheme that you can afford. If the council approve of your suggestion, they will ask the bailiffs to stop calling you and save you extra fees in the long run.

DO I HAVE TO LET THE BAILIFFS IN?

One thing that you must know about bailiffs is that you do not have the responsibility to take them in whenever they come. In fact, you can choose not to let them inside your home. If the bailiffs have never been into your home, they have no right to come in at anytime of the day. It is also unlawful for them to break in.

As a form of precaution, avoid the following scenarios:

- Do not open your doors to the bailiffs. Once you entertain them, they will have the power to push past you. If they get inside, they will have the right to enter again and take more of your goods.
- Do not leave your doors and windows unlocked because bailiffs can easily take advantage of any kind of opening. As they cannot ask the police to help them break in, your carelessness is their only ticket.
- Do not fall to any kind of trap. Bailiffs can make several bluffs like asking to use the toilet or the telephone just so they can lure you towards letting them in.
- Do not leave your valuables lying around. Bailiffs can easily take away anything valuable that they lay their eyes and hands on. Make sure that your cars are always shielded from view.
- Do not make transactions inside your home. If you have a certain amount to pay the bailiffs out for your debt, do so but make sure that you transact outside. Do not forget to take a receipt as well.
- Do not sign anything that the bailiffs ask you to. The bailiffs do not have the right to make you sign any sort of document, whether it was left posted in your door or handed out to you personally.

THE BAILIFFS HAVE ALREADY BEEN INSIDE MY HOME

If you allowed the bailiffs go inside your home at once, you are in for a more serious situation. Once bailiffs are let inside, they will have the right to come back again. If you choose not to let them in the second time, they will have the right to break in. What you can do to repair this problem is to get in touch with your local council immediately or make the necessary arrangements with the bailiffs. You can ask your local councilor for help or you can devise a specific payment scheme that you can afford and present it to the bailiffs. If they agree on your terms, you can prevent them from coming back and take any more of your things. Also make sure that you take a receipt of your every payment to be on the safe side.

WHAT THINGS ARE THE BAILIFFS ALLOWED TO TAKE?

Most of your valuables can be legally taken by the bailiffs except for the following:
- Anything that was rented or hired.
- Items or equipments that are necessary for your personal and professional use.
- Your basic daily needs such as clothing, bedding, and furniture.

You will notice that exemptions are not really item specific. The bailiffs may have different interpretation of which items they can take legally or not. If you feel that what they have taken away should have been exempted, you can file an appropriate complaint in your local council.

CAN THE BAILIFFS TAKE THINGS WHICH ARE NOT MINE?

It has been clearly established by the law that the bailiffs can only take what are legally yours. This include items that you co-own with your partner. If the bailiffs attempt to take anything that you do not own, politely tell them about the item’s ownership by showing receipts or proofs of purchase that will indeed tell them that it is not yours. Also, the owner of the goods can make a sworn statement or a statutory declaration about the real ownership of the items.

Other things that bailiffs cannot take are the ones that are rented or hired. Make sure that you keep a copy of your agreement with the real owner so the bailiffs will not take them away.

WHAT IF I HIDE THINGS OR GIVE THEM AWAY?

It is legal to hide your valuables if the bailiffs have never been inside your home. Once they step in, however, they will list all the items they intend to take. If you try to hide any of those things elsewhere other than your home, you will be committing an offence that is punishable by the law. If you are able to keep the items discreetly out of sight, the bailiffs can rightfully search for them on visits.

BAILIFFS PROCEDURES

The good news is that bailiffs cannot break inside your home just like that. They are also covered by certain laws and procedures that they must adhere to including the following:
- Bailiffs must bring with them a written authorization or a certificate from the local council.
- Bailiffs must hand you a copy of the “Enforcement Regulations” which contain information on what they are only allowed to do.
- Bailiffs must also bring with them a statement of charges that they can take with each visit. They should never make additions to blow up your debts.
- Bailiffs must also bring with them a “Walking Possession” agreement duly signed by you. This agreement contains the list of items that they have warned to take right from their first visit.

HOW DO I STOP THE BAILIFFS?

The most effective measure to stop the bailiffs from taking away your things is to make an arrangement on how you can pay your debt. Devising an effective installment plan will be beneficial for you especially if the bailiffs have never been into your home. Offer only what you can afford to pay to prevent any form of misunderstanding to take place.

The bailiffs cannot send you to prison. If they fail to break into your home, their most appropriate action is to pass your debt back to the council. If this happens, it would be much easier to settle the problem. You better take this as a priority debt because if you do not act on it immediately, the council will find another way to recover the money. They can file an Attachment of Earnings Order, which will take out money from your earnings or other form of order that will summon you to pay your financial obligations dutifully.

In some instances, the council may agree to exempt your case from bringing it to the bailiffs’ attention. The council allow direct payment schemes for those who are on Income Support, Pension Credit, and Job Seekers’ Allowance. Better yet, ask the council whether they can take back your case from the bailiffs so you can deal with them directly. Your local councilor can help you make the deal with the council. Explain your reasons and whatever difficulty it will bring you in case the bailiffs break into your home and take your things to stand a chance for a consideration.

HOW DO I COMPLAIN?

There are Enforcement Regulations that the bailiffs must adhere to. However, the National Standards for Enforcement Agents issued by the Lord Chancellors Department is quite tricky. Although it provides specific guidelines on bailiffs’ behavior in carrying out their duties, mentioning these standards in your complaint may be or may not be beneficial to you. You can look out for the standards yourself through the Department for Constitutional Affairs website

(www.dca.gov.uk/enforcement/agents02.htm).

The law concerning the bailiffs is complex but you can start learning it through by reading the law yourself and trying to understand every bit of technicalities in it. Your personal effort, however, may not be sufficient. If you can, it would be best to get a legal advice on what you can do against what you feel is unlawful action of the bailiffs.

Since October 1998, the bailiffs need to act with a certificate at hand. This certificate to collect Council Tax must be granted by the court. Filing a complaint against the bailiffs can have their certificate withdrawn and their right to enter your house forfeited. To file a complaint, you can write a formal letter to the Court Manager so he can administer a hearing. Once the court find substance in your complaint, it can rule out to cancel the bailiffs’ certificate, order compensation as well as return of the surrendered goods. Some cases acted favorably to the complainants where their debts have been written off due to the bailiffs’ illegal acts. This is one of the reasons why you should not take your complaint sitting down. Once you discover an irregularity, you must rush to the Magistrates Court to file a complaint.

The bailiffs report directly to the council and it would be ideal to bring your case there. Once it receives your complaint, it must order the bailiffs to change their procedures. If this do not work, you can call the attention of your local councilor or your local government Ombudsman to look through your case.

BAILIFFS CHARGES

If the bailiffs are asking for excessive charges, you can use it as a case for complaint. You can make a written notice to the council telling them that what has been taken from you may be way too much. You can also seek advice from the County Court regarding the appropriate fines the bailiffs can charge you.

Your common sense and your knowledge on local processes can also be useful in determining what amount of fine is reasonable and what is not. If, for example, the bailiffs charged you 80 for attendance with a van and hiring a van costs only 40, you are obviously charged unfairly. When such circumstance takes place, you can instantly call the attention of the bailiffs. Warn them that you will take further action for your complaint to be recognized if they refuse to follow the regulated schedule.

Submit a written complaint to the council so they know how the bailiffs are illegally carrying out their duties. Other than that, you can also apply for a “Taxation” in the County Court. This kind of application will ask the court to look through your complaint within 12 months after which they should submit a decision whether the bailiffs charges have been excessive or not. If the court decides against you, you will be held liable for the bailiffs’ firm’s court costs. That’s why you must be careful in taking such action. Please remember, however, that making complaints is worth your every effort especially when you are loaded with evidences that will prove that the bailiffs stepped out of the line.

USEFUL LINKS

The Secretary
Association of Civil Enforcement Agencies
Kensington House
33 Imperial Square
Cheltenam
Glos
Tel: 01242 241456
Website: www.acea.org.uk

The Secretary
Enforcement Services Association (ENSAS) (formally The Certificated Bailiffs Association)
Ridgefield House
14 John Dalton Street
Manchester
M2 6JR
Tel: 0161 839 7225
Website: www.bailiffs.org.uk

Local Government Ombudsman (England)
Millbank Tower
Millbank
London SW1P 4QP
Advice Line: 0845 602 1983
Monday to Friday, 9.00 am – 4.30 pm
Website: www.lgo.org.uk
Note: There are a total of three local government Ombudsman offices for England. You may check whom to send a complaint by calling the Advice Line.

Local Government Ombudsman (Wales)
Derwen House Court Road Bridgend
CF31 1BN
Tel: 01656 661 325
Website: www.ombudsman-wales.org

 

Asking for a lot of money

09 Mar

Most people dream of making a lot of money. The question is, what does that mean?

The truth is that money is highly subjective. Certainly, a billion dollars is a lot of money; there are only a handful of billionaires in the world. Is a million dollars a lot? In terms of total wealth, no; a significant minority of the population has a million dollars or more in total assets to leave to their heirs, largely due to the appreciation of real estate. Were one to make a million dollars a year, however, that person would be among the most highly paid in the world.

Personal perception has a significant role in determining the amount of money that a person can expect to make. The reason for this is that the two factors that most influence earnings–level of demonstrable skill, and payment requested from an employer–are very dependent upon the individual. Moreover, while skill is partially based on individual confidence and partially dependent upon innate ability, the amount of money that a person asks an employer to provide is solely based on the individual.

Of course, the two are related. One cannot have a minimal skillset and expect to receive a high salary. However, many people have excellent skillsets yet are paid comparatively little versus their peers. Why?

The truth is, they probably didn’t ask–or if they did, they didn’t ask in a way that conveyed they really thought that they deserved what they wanted. In many cases, the boss knows the most that he or she can pay, but will be pleased to pay less if an employee will accept it.

Of course, the boss will not tell the employee what he or she can actually afford to pay. But dealing with that is comparatively easy in the Information Age: there are salary guidelines for given locales and positions available on the Internet. The real challenge is not asking a high level of compensation, but feeling that you deserve the high level of compensation for which you are asking.

To do that, one must understand the relative value of money. We have established that being a billionaire is truly remarkable, and that accumulating a million dollars over a lifetime is not but that making a million dollars per year is. What about lower income levels–the sort that we tend to see in everyday life?

How much is a lot?

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Poverty Guideline for a family of four in 2006 is $20,000. A family that makes this amount or less is, by definition, poor.

The median income reported for a family of four in 2006, however, ranged from a low of $45,867 in New Mexico to a high of $87,412 in New Jersey. These figures include single- and multi-earner households.

Consider a candidate in New Jersey who holds a degree in a moderate-demand field. Will he or she accept a salary of $20,000? Probably not. Expecting a salary of $87,412 may seem excessive, though, because he or she would, as a single earner, be requesting the average income of a family of four.

But is it excessive? Actually, no; if $87,412 is the median salary–meaning there are an equal number of earners above and below that mark–the candidate could, in fact, confidently request $90,000 or more. The reaction from a hiring manager would depend in part on the industry and also in part of the applicant’s specific skillset. Another candidate, in another job, however, could ask for it and get it. The trick is to have the audacity to ask.

A real-life story

Shortly after I finished college, someone I knew earned $40,000 a year. His stated goal was to reach a salary of $50,000. He worked hard to apply himself to education and professional development, and volunteered for special projects to expand his skillset.

His next job offer caught him off-guard: $73,000. He took it, of course, astonished at how much he now made. Within a few months, though, he realized that others in the field made considerably more. He stayed active in professional development and worked hard to master new skills.

A year into the job, he requested an increase in salary, providing his employer with salary survey data and other information. He received a raise to $89,000 and was offered an incentive plan based on performance.

After three years, he decided to leave. He interviewed at a number of top companies that were excited to meet him. He had an offer from one for $110,000 and then got an offer from another for $115,000. Deciding that he prefered the first company, he asked if they would increase their offer. Knowing that this would require approval, however, he offered to take an initial salary of $100,000 until he finished his probationary period. They accepted.

Four years ago, he aspired to someday make $50,000. Today, he makes $115,000–and considers $200,000 to be easily within reach given a few more years. And why?

Because he asked.

 

Are You Suffering From Payment Protection Overload?

02 Mar

Critical illness insurance:

Critical illness insurance will cover you in the event of a serious illness such as cancer, coronary artery by-pass surgery, heart attack, kidney failure, major organ transplant, multiple sclerosis and stroke. Additional conditions covered by this insurance can include aorta graft surgery, benign brain tumour, blindness, coma, deafness, heart valve replacement or repair, loss of limbs, loss of speech, motor neurone disease, paralysis/paraplegia, Parkinsons disease, terminal illness and third degree burns. Not all insurance companies will necessarily cover all of these illnesses, whilst some insurance companies will cover more; it is always worth reading the terms and conditions before you sign anything.

Critical illness insurance policies typically offer a tax-free lump sum if you are diagnosed with one of the above illnesses and meet the conditions outlined in the policy contract. The lump sum is most often used to cover the remainder of the mortgage, although can be spent on home alterations or medical care etc.

Life insurance:

Life insurance is usually taken out if your family or partner is financially dependent on your income. Life insurance can also be purchased as life assurance and in this form, can offer a method of protection cover and savings. However, most people simply use it as a form of financial protection for their mortgage and therefore their family. There are three main types of life insurance: term insurance, whole life insurance and endowment insurance. More information can be found on these forms of life insurance on the Association of British Insurers website, listed in the resources section of this article.

Mortgage life insurance:

Mortgage life insurance is essentially the same as a decreasing (lump-sum) term life insurance policy and is designed to pay out a lump sum upon the death of the policy holder, should it occur during the term of the mortgage. The size of the lump sum will decrease over the term of the life insurance policy, in the line with the outstanding mortgage repayments. E.g. As you pay off your mortgage, the amount of cover will decrease as the need is less significant.

Mortgage protection:

Mortgage protection, also called mortgage payment protection, is a type of insurance that can help protect mortgage payments and associated household costs in the event of unemployment, illness or an accident. Through mortgage payment protection, you can insure your monthly mortgage payment, monthly life premiums and the monthly cost of your buildings and content insurance. Typical mortgage protection cover could include:

* Unemployment and disability insurance cover
* Accident or sickness
* Unemployment only insurance cover
* Disability only insurance cover

Loan payment protection:

Loan payment protection policies are designed to protect the repayments to any loans you may have taken out. They work on a similar basis to mortgage payment protection, but for a wider scope of borrowing. Premiums for loan payment may be greater than those for mortgage protection.

Income protection:

In the event of unemployment, sickness or an accident, income protection insurance offers a limited income. Do make sure you understand the terms of the policy however, as the income that you received through cover may be significantly less than the income you receive through employment.

Private medical insurance:

Private medical insurance is a policy which will provide financial cover for medical treatment in the event of an acute condition. According to the Association of British Insurers, the majority of insurers define an acute condition as a disease, illness or injury that is likely to respond quickly to treatment which aims to return you to the state of health you were in, immediately before suffering the disease, illness or injury, or which leads to your full recovery.

Private medical insurance provides reassurance for people who know that treatment is available promptly should they become ill or injured.

Resources:
http://www.abi.org.uk/ The Association of British Insurers
http://www.moneynet.co.uk/insurance/index.shtml Consumer Insurance Comparison Research
http://www.moneynet.co.uk/home-car-travel-insurance-guide/index.shtml Insurance Guide